The Supreme Court explained the Rules of the Road

The Supreme Court recognized the optional presence of a doctor checking drivers’ sobriety, but also found that any crossing double solid line - a trip to the oncoming lane. Experts happy for inspectors: they will give more bribes.

2 November 2006 | bar, court, doctor, driver, intersection, line, movement, rule, travel

In the Kuzbass for numerous traffic violations motorist denied rights to 49 years
How to choose a driving school?

• Any intersection of the continuous marking, the Supreme Court equated to leave for oncoming traffic »»»
What maneuver should be considered at the exit lane of oncoming traffic?
• The Supreme Court will consider a claim for the abolition of all privileges for machines with spetssignalami »»»
Machines with spetssignalami may be left without benefits. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will consider the claim residents of the Kaliningrad region, Yuri Zevakina who contested the obligation to give way to the driver’s cars with flashing lights.
• How to pay fines chute and radio! »»»
Bailiffs to raid drivers, do not pay the fine. If the defaulter refuses to give a penalty in place, officers arrested his assets - radio, spare tire, or the whole machine.
• The Supreme Court has forbidden to punish drunk drivers only for the presence of cars »»»
Russian Supreme Court basically defended all motorists of the country from unwarranted accusations of drunkenness at the wheel when the car is standing still.
• What are the requirements of traffic police officers must comply with the motorist? »»»
As is typical with the inspector DPS? You submit the document window, and the inspector (and sometimes it does not matter, there is a violation or not) offers you get in their car (or simply “deal”, or to the protocol).